Farmers must have right to choose on GE - Langford
Federated Farmers supports a review of the current genetic technology legislation but insists that a farmer’s right to either choose or reject it must be protected.
Local Federated Farmers chair Greg Anderson describes the new regulation as "death by a thousand cuts". He says farmers are worried about how the propsed regulations will impact on what they can do with their land.
Timaru District Council (TDC) has identified the first 4,000 property owners in the region whose land fits into the five categories of the SASM regulations - including cultural landscapes, land-based places, sacred land, waterways and sacred areas.
Under the Resource Management Act, councils must recognise and provide for the relationship of Māori culture and traditions of ancestral lands, water, sites, wāhi tapu (sacred place or site), and other taoka (treasure, especially items of historical cultural significance) through their district plan.
"We've already got SNAs, outstanding landscapes and biodiversity rules and now with SASMs. It is driving the farming community mad," Anderson says.
He is critical of the TDC who involved local rūnanga in developing the policy but did not consult the farming community.
"TDC did not involve landowners at the start of this consultation process in helping identify these sites."
The lack of farmer consultation is confirmed on the council's website, where it describes the process on how SASMs were identified.
"TDC has worked closely with local rūnanga, Arowhenua, to identify SASM. Rūnanga used a wide range of information from historic maps, oral histories and document archives held by agencies such as Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu and NZ Heritage to identify areas that are culturally significant to Arowhenua Rūnanga," it says.
"Sites that were identified include for example, sites in which mana whenua lived/camped and gathered kai, burial sites, battle grounds, sites of spiritual significance and that is of importance to ancestors. These were looked at closely and their extents mapped and then how these SASM could be protected into the future."
Anderson claims that farmers are reasonable people and if any had rock art, a pa site or a burial ground on their properties most would go out of their way to look after these sites.
"But TDC is trying to bring in heavy-handed rules, which leads to needing resource consents to carry on farming and costs money," he adds. "Then you have to conult with the local rūnanga and get a cultural report done, which again, all costs money."
Anderson says while farmers will still have existing use rights, meaning if they have cultivated a paddock before or farmed in a certain way they will be able to continue.
"However, if you want to change or tweak your farming regime then you have got problems."
