fbpx
Print this page
Friday, 22 January 2016 12:11

Holiday pay mistake leads to penalties

Written by 
A Canterbury dairy farm has been penalised for employment law breaches in what the Labour Inspectorate says "not uncommon" mistake in holiday entitlements. A Canterbury dairy farm has been penalised for employment law breaches in what the Labour Inspectorate says "not uncommon" mistake in holiday entitlements.

A Canterbury dairy farm has been penalised for employment law breaches in what the Labour Inspectorate says "not uncommon" mistake in holiday entitlements.

The Employment Relations Authority (ERA) has ordered Viewbank Dairy Ltd near Rakaia to rectify employment law breaches discovered by Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment's Labour Inspectorate and pay $7500 in penalties.

The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment's Labour Inspectorate visited the farm as part of an audit to check for compliance with minimum employment standards on dairy farms. A number of breaches were identified and an improvement notice was issued. The Inspector brought the case before the ERA when the employer failed to comply with parts of the notice.

Labour Inspectorate southern regional manager Stuart Lumsden says the investigation found that several workers had been treated as casual employees when in fact they were permanent.

"As a result, employees were provided with incorrect holiday entitlements. They were getting paid eight per cent on top of their usual pay, when in fact they were entitled to four weeks' holiday pay, pro-rated, under the Holidays Act 2003," he says.

"This is not an uncommon mistake and employers need to remember that the eight per cent arrangement is only lawful for employees who are on a fixed term contract or who work irregularly or intermittently – for instance on-call workers. In all other cases the four weeks' pro-rated rule applies."

The employer also failed to keep accurate employment records as required by the law and made deductions for accommodation from the workers' pay without written evidence that the deductions were specified and agreed to by the employees.

"Without accurate documentation the employer has no way of demonstrating that correct entitlements are provided to employees," says Lumsden.

The ERA determined $7500 is to be paid as a penalty for the breaches and ordered the employer to repay money owed to workers.

More like this

Drunk on power!

OPINION: The end-of-year booze-up at the posh Northern Club in Auckland must have been a beauty, as the legal 'elite' let their hair down and showed us how entitled and political some in the judiciary really are.

'If it seems weird, report it' - Police

Southern District Police are investigating a number of thefts, with tools and ATVs among the items stolen across a wide area, from the outskirts of Invercargill to as far out as Hedgehope.

Director ordered to pay $48,000 in penalties

A Hawke’s Bay horticulture company and its owner, who is banned from acting as a director or manager of any company until 2028, have been ordered to pay penalties of $48,000 by the Employment Relations Authority.

Featured

Langfords crowned Share Farmers of the Year

As the New Zealand Dairy Industry Awards night unfolded, it became evident that Waikato’s Thomas and Fiona Langford were the frontrunners for the biggest prize of the night – the 2025 Share Farmers of the Year award.

ANZCO Foods' net profit plunges

Meat processor ANZCO Foods’ net profit has plunged on the back of lower market returns which squeezed margins and impacted business performance.

Editorial: Forest for the trees?

OPINION: Most people will be aware of the Government's plans to boost coal, oil and gas production to meet energy requirements.

National

Machinery & Products

Gongs for best field days site

Among the regular exhibitors at last month’s South Island Agricultural Field Days, the one that arguably takes the most intensive…