fbpx
Print this page
Thursday, 31 October 2019 09:55

No silver bullet for phosphorus

Written by  Mike Manning, Ravensdown general manager, innovation and strategy
A new polymer coating for superphosphates. A new polymer coating for superphosphates.

In New Zealand’s soils, phosphorus does a great job at growing plants but unfortunately it does the same thing if it makes it into our water.

Once dissolved phosphate is in surface water, it assists in growing the wrong plants such as oxygen-depleting algae that starve other organisms. 

There has been plenty of heat and noise about the Government’s proposed limit for dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) in New Zealand’s waterways and its impact on food creation. But the proposed limit for dissolved reactive phosphate (DRP) deserves just as much focus because the implications are just as serious. The proposed 0.018 parts per million limit for DRP is certainly ambitious.  The impacts of such an in-stream phosphate limit could affect more catchments than the proposed nitrogen limit: approximately 30% of monitored river sites exceed this threshold.   

To paraphrase the old saying, ‘For every complex problem, there’s someone selling a solution that’s clear, simple and often wrong.’ Anyone with a partly soluble product to peddle who says it’s a silver bullet to hit any newly imposed limit is ignoring the most important study of its kind from four eminent professors in Journal of Environmental Quality.  

Earlier this year, professors David Nash and Mike Mclaughlin from Australia and professors Richard McDowell and Leo Condron from New Zealand contrasted the P-loss effects of poorly and well managed fertiliser applications. They found “under poor management, recently applied P fertiliser can contribute a considerable proportion (30-80%) of total farm P exports in drainage, but when fertiliser is well managed, that figure is expected to be less than 10%”.

Good fertiliser management constitutes placing the right amount of the right nutrient in the right place at the right time: the trusty ‘Four Rs’.  Yes, there are innovations in the pipeline such as coatings or amendments that can better control the release of the phosphate and there are slow-release P products on the market today. But these are no substitute for getting the right advice, testing, modelling and mitigations from a certified nutrient management advisor combined with more precise and traceable application from a Spreadmark accredited company. 

Everyone wants to see P stay available to the right plants. It’s the best thing for the environment. Farmers certainly don’t want to pay to create a whole lot of underwater greenery. But farms, soils and waterways are complex systems and losses will occur. Their complexity also means that, whatever eventual DRP limit finds its way through the consultation process, the answer won’t just be as simple as “Buy New Product X.”

• Mike Manning is Ravensdown general manager, innovation and strategy

More like this

Farmers up their game

A Waikato environmentalist who led a public campaign against poor winter grazing practices on Southland farms says farmers are making improvements.

Data-driven irrigation

A web-based technology is now available to help farmers better manage their water resources and improve decision-making around irrigation.

Making good use of a crisis

One of New Zealand’s largest dairy farmers says the Covid-19 pandemic presents the country an opportunity to rethink its approach to on-farm sustainability.

New crops offer opportunities

Six ‘star’ crops – soy, hemp, chickpeas, oats, buckwheat and quinoa – could represent new opportunities for New Zealand farmers.

Featured

Parker dropped the EU FTA ball – Nats

Don’t blame the European Union for its “unacceptable” offer to NZ agriculture in current FTA negotiations, blame David Parker, says National's trade spokesman.

 

Grief over grain drain

A whole generation of farmers don’t seem to know about the advantages of feeding NZ-grown grain to livestock, claims Jeremy Talbot.