increase font size
Canterbury plains.
So much time and energy is spent managing land and water at present, and decisions about rules are only the first step.
What those rules look like and how much they will cost farmers and the community to implement also needs close scrutiny. Take a couple of examples from Canterbury.
Overseer: like it or hate it. Canterbury farmers are required to record an estimate of their nitrogen losses using Overseer. Personally I don’t have an issue with that. But I do have a problem with the rules which require farmers to redo their Overseer assessment every year, whether or not they have made significant changes on the farm.
Then you keep that filed away in case the council ever wants to see it.
Sounds like a dolly, until you start looking at the cost. I’ve been given estimates for annual Overseer assessments (from certified practitioners) ranging from $1000-$1500 for a simple farming operation to $5000-$10,000 for more complex arable and mixed farming systems.
So assuming the 7000-odd farmers in Canterbury were all ‘simple’ Overseer assessments, that rule is costing $7m-$10.5m per annum, but probably a lot more.
Call me a pragmatic greenie, but I would much rather money was spent on doing something constructive on the ground, and keeping the Overseer assessments for when they’re needed.
Some catchment plans require all farms to have a farm environment plan (FEP). Now don’t get me wrong, I happen to think farm plans are a useful tool, and there are some excellent industry programmes.
My beef is that the rules require all farmers to have an audited FEP irrespective of whether there are any potential issues with water quality.
North Canterbury Federated Farmers raised this matter in a recent hearing in Canterbury and the rules in that catchment plan were revised as a result.
My favourite example has to be a water plan in Canterbury which requires all farmers to enter into some sort of binding collective by 2017 or get resource consent to keep farming.
• Lynda Murchison is North Canterbury Federated Farmers provincial president.
Mid Canterbury Federated Farmers arable chair, Bevan Lill, said Beef + Lamb NZ data indicated that for the last six years, the average arable return on investment was about 0.8% while inflation ran about 4% - so the average arable farm was going backwards at about 3% a year.
A warning for New Zealand seed and grain companies – be prepared for an exodus of farmers from the arable sector.
Gareth Hale is the current custodian of a 160-year legacy that saw his great grandfather dairying in Taranaki since the mid-1850s and grandfather dairying in the Waikato from the early 1900s.
A spat within the ranks of the New Zealand Deer Farmers Association has resulted in the suspension of outspoken North Canterbury farmer Barry Cuttance.
Efficiency is the big one because it tracks back into what is done on farm.
Flat pricing in the face of significant increases in costs is the greatest problem facing the arable sector, says Foundation for Arable Research (FAR) chief executive Dr Scott Champion.
Entries opened on Monday, 5 October 2026 for the 2027 New Zealand Dairy Industry Awards (NZDIA), which organisers describe as the nation's biggest celebration of excellence in the dairy sector.
Waikato milk processor Tatua has again declared a record milk payout to farmer shareholders, leaving other processors in the dust.
A Labour-led Government won’t be bringing back the controversial freshwater rules of 2020.
National’s much-touted free trade deal with India featured in the Rural Issues Debate at Mystery Creek, Hamilton on Wednesday night.
New Zealand's 2026-27 freshwater fishing season has opened, with anglers encouraged to head to rivers and lakes over the coming days as conditions look favourable across much of the country.
