fbpx
Print this page
Tuesday, 16 February 2016 15:28

Pressure on science has not worked

Written by  Peter Burke
Mike Hedley. Mike Hedley.

A leading soil scientist says the exact science to meet the demand by the public and government to improve water quality hasn't been in place.

Massey University's professor Mike Hedley says consequently the policymakers have made decisions without really knowing what the exact changes to farm management need to be to achieve this outcome.

He says much of the science used has been in nutrient budgeting, which works well at paddock and farm scale but is poorly connected to water quality.

Hedley is director of the Fertiliser and Lime Research Centre, Massey University, which last week held its annual workshop at the Manawatu campus. At least 250 scientists, farmers and rural professionals attended the three-day event.

This year's theme was nutrient and water management for sustainable farming. Hedley says it was designed to link with the Government's latest science challenge 'Our Land and Water', which will see $230 million spent by CRIs and universities over the next ten years to produce definitive science on how to best manage land and water in New Zealand.

He hopes the collective science expertise will yield real answers for farmers struggling to try to change their farming systems and reduce the impact of diffuse discharge into water.

Hedley says a suggestion that land should be viewed in terms of its suitability rather than its capability will signal a change in land use. In the past, science has mostly driven productivity, irrespective of the potential adverse effects that could have on the environment.

"We need a bit of rethinking of the mitigation strategies of different land units and soil types," he explains. "Some, but not all of it, can be done on individual properties, but it is going to be a tough one to crack and we have to discuss that with farming communities.

"A scenario could involve neighbouring farmers collaborating and developing a share farming agreement; for example, where at a certain time of year they don't have intensive stock on certain soils on one of the farms when there is a high risk of leaching nitrogen or phosphorous into the water."

Hedley believes hard questions will have to be asked about the way we farm in NZ. He says in the present environment of low returns for some agricultural products, farmers are looking more closely at their operations. He suggests this may be a good time for them to look long-term and identify sustainable options for their farms.

More like this

Chicken Little

OPINION: If you're one of the few still reading the NZ Herald, you'd have seen Chicken Little academics screaming that the sky is falling because Judith Collins has focused Marsden science grants on actual science.

Featured

Gongs for best field days site

Among the regular exhibitors at last month’s South Island Agricultural Field Days, the one that arguably takes the most intensive preparation every time is the PGG Wrightson Seeds site.

Feed help supplements Canterbury farmers meet protein goals

Two high producing Canterbury dairy farmers are moving to blended stockfeed supplements fed in-shed for a number of reasons, not the least of which is to boost protein levels, which they can’t achieve through pasture under the region’s nitrogen limit of 190kg/ha.

National

Machinery & Products

Buhler name to go

Shareholders at a special meeting have approved a proposed deal that will see Buhler Industries, the publicly traded Versatile and…

Grabbing bales made quick and easy

Front end loader and implement specialist Quicke has introduced the new Unigrip L+ and XL+ next-generation bale grabs, designed for…