fbpx
Print this page
Tuesday, 04 September 2012 16:38

Case made for company vs trust

Written by 

THOUGH MANY farms are in trusts, Palmerston North Crown prosecutor Ben Vanderkolk believes this creates problems in succession planning. 

He says essentially a trust is ‘just a bundle of rights and obligations’ which doesn’t ‘own anything’.  The obligation of the trustees is to look after the interests of the ‘beneficiaries’, in most cases siblings.

“A trust has no corporate structure so it doesn’t grow or prosper or manage anything. Trusts are very difficult to unscramble. The key problem is that the trustees are the owner of the whole asset – it is difficult to administer in a way that children can get funds out or have their entitlement distributed to them.  And it’s rare that children will challenge the trustees, who are usually the parents alongside the family solicitor and accountant.”

Vanderkolk says from what he’s seen, trusts have a place in protecting assets but are poor vehicles for farming operations and capital holding. And structurally they are difficult to operate.  A question worth asking, when considering setting up a trust, is, can you guarantee that you can control it after your death? 

“With a company you can have just enough capital needed to run the business, and the rest of the capital generated as dividends, profits and retained earnings is available for investment off the farm or to buy shareholders out. There are advantages in a company structure because equity is reflected by the value of the shares, directors are charged with increasing shareholder value and capital can be managed to successfully fund the operation.”

With a company structure, the children could be encouraged to participate in its governance as opposed to merely being employees on farm.  Parents or owners should find out what their children want to do and make sure the entity has sufficient capital for them to pursue off-farm careers if that’s what they want.

“Fundamentally a company director has to protect the value of the company shareholding whereas a trustee has a duty to protect and promote the benefit and maintenance of the beneficiaries, not necessarily grow the wealth of the business. Farmers should be able to concentrate on farming and governance of the farming enterprise rather than worry about the discharge of their fiduciary duty as trustees.”

• For a profile of Ben Vanderkolk turn to pages 10-11

More like this

Be aware of potential liabilities

It is important for potential trustees to weigh up the risks compared to the rewards when considering whether or not to accept a role on a trust, says Tony Marshall, tax advisory principal, Crowe Horwarth's Dunedin office.

Featured

Gongs for best field days site

Among the regular exhibitors at last month’s South Island Agricultural Field Days, the one that arguably takes the most intensive preparation every time is the PGG Wrightson Seeds site.

Feed help supplements Canterbury farmers meet protein goals

Two high producing Canterbury dairy farmers are moving to blended stockfeed supplements fed in-shed for a number of reasons, not the least of which is to boost protein levels, which they can’t achieve through pasture under the region’s nitrogen limit of 190kg/ha.

National

Machinery & Products

Buhler name to go

Shareholders at a special meeting have approved a proposed deal that will see Buhler Industries, the publicly traded Versatile and…

Grabbing bales made quick and easy

Front end loader and implement specialist Quicke has introduced the new Unigrip L+ and XL+ next-generation bale grabs, designed for…