Alliance plans to offload 65% of shares for $250m
Alliance Group has announced plans to sell a 65% stake in the farmer-owned co-operative to Irish meat processor Dawn Meats Group for $250 million.
After being dogged by claims about its entitlement to the wage subsidy, the country’s largest meat processor will now fully pay it back.
Just prior to Christmas, the Alliance Group announced that it “had chosen to return the balance of the wage subsidy to the Ministry of Social Development (MSD).”
The company had already repaid $21 million of the $34m wage subsidy it claimed during the Covid lockdown and said it will now return the balance.
“From the outset, Alliance has been clear we would only use the wage subsidy in the way it was intended by government and our previous re-payments reflect this commitment,” chair Murray Taggart explained.
“Following the filing of our company accounts last month, the Alliance board believes the co-operative is in a position to repay the remaining balance. We acknowledge the support and certainty the Government provided to help us keep many of our people in jobs.”
Taggart added that the company had retained $1.9 million for the Leave Support Scheme payment to employees that were required to self-isolate or were unable to work.
Alliance had been under pressure to repay the subsidy following the move by rival meat processor Silver Fern Farm to pay it back and had been facing a private prosecution by self-proclaimed professional campaigner Simon Lusk for only returning part of the $34.3 million Covid-19 wage subsidy it claimed.
In September, Lusk sought leave of the court to bring a private prosecution against the South Island meat company’s non-executive directors for Alliance’s “disgraceful” failure to completely repay the wage subsidy.
Alliance – along with other meat processors – was declared as an essential food-producing service and permitted to keep operating during New Zealand’s March-imposed Covid-19 lockdown. In September, the farmer-owned co-op said it had repaid 50% of the wage subsidy claimed. It has since then paid back another $4m, leaving it $13m short of what it claimed in total.
In November, Alliance announced an underlying profit of $27.4m for the 2019-20. However, adjusted for a one-off historical wage claim of $20 million, its annual profit was only $7.5m before tax.
At the time, Alliance chief executive David Surveyor told Rural News Lusk’s claims were unfounded and show no understanding of the process being run by the Ministry of Social Development (MSD).
“Alliance Group has always been open and upfront about the wage subsidy application, which has been widely shared with the public. We have been in ongoing constructive discussions with MSD about the application of the subsidy and stated from the outset that we would return any funds not used to pay people.”
Alliance wasn’t the only meat company to claim the wage subsidy. Silver Fern Farms was paid $43.2m and the Anzco Group got $17.3m. Several other smaller meat companies also claimed it. Silver Fern Farms repaid the subsidy in full.
Meanwhile, other large meat industry players did not claim the subsidy, including Affco, Greenlea and Hellaby.
Beef + Lamb New Zealand says it is seeing strong farmer interest in its newly launched nProve Beef genetics tool, with early feedback and usage insights confirming its value in helping farmers make better breeding decisions and drive genetic improvement in New Zealand's beef herd.
The Innovation Awards at June's National Fieldays showcased several new ideas, alongside previous entries that had reached commercial reality.
To assist the flower industry in reducing waste and drive up demand, Wonky Box has partnered with Burwood to create Wonky Flowers.
Three new directors are joining Horticulture New Zealand’s board from this month.
Beef + Lamb New Zealand (B+LNZ) says proposed changes to the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) will leave the door wide open for continued conversions of productive sheep and beef farms into carbon forestry.
Federated Farmers says a report to Parliament on the subject of a ban on carbon forestry does not go far enough to prevent continued farm to forestry conversions.