Paris Agreement - stay or leave?
There has been a bit of discussion in the media lately about the Paris climate agreement and whether New Zealand should withdraw from it.
The research was undertaken by scientists and officials from across Australia, and was based on data collected over eight years of research as part of the Meat & Livestock Australia's (MLA) methane abatement research programs.
The new methodology also brings the NGGI in line with the estimates of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the leading international body on the assessment of climate change, established by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the World Meteorological Organisation in 1988.
CSIRO Agriculture's research scientist, Dr Ed Charmley, says the work was conducted because of concerns about the large differential between NGGI and IPCC methane emission figures for Australian cattle. There was also doubt surrounding the accuracy of previous calculation methodologies used for cattle, particularly northern Australian cattle.
"Different methods used to calculate emissions from livestock in temperate and tropical regions were based on studies done in the 1960s and 1990s, mainly with dairy cattle," says Charmley.
"Both of these past methods were found to be likely over-estimating the emissions from cattle.
"The revised method, which is based on improved ways of estimating ruminant methane emissions from forage-fed beef and dairy cattle, be they in temperate or tropical regions, has been tested against international defaults provided by the IPCC and found to give consistent methane yields."
MLA general manager, On Farm Innovation, Matthew McDonagh, says the results of the research provide an accurate dataset which clearly show's Australian cattle contribute substantially less to methane emissions than previously believed.
"This is positive news for the Australian livestock sector as it seeks to continually improve its production efficiencies and demonstrate its environmental credentials." says McDonagh.
