Birds' Eye: Drone surveillance in vineyards
The unique attributes offered by vertical take-off and landing drones are transforming a range of civilian roles, from firefighting to traffic monitoring and now vineyard management.
Thousands of Kiwi drone and e-bike owners are being warned to check their insurance policies.
It appears insurers have not kept pace with these new technologies, meaning consumers who are concerned about the level or type of cover are being advised to consult a broker.
The brokerage NZ Brokers says its analysis of offered home contents policies found a lot of complexity and variation in policy wording; this can leave many e-bike and drone owners unexpectedly without cover for loss, damage or third-party liability.
Drones and e-bikes may be thought of as resembling model aircraft or pushbikes, but insurance companies see them differently. A company may insure your $5000 pushbike but not an e-bike bought at that price because of terms in the policy or the legal status of the machine.
Likewise, a drone may be treated by insurers as a type of aircraft if it can lift more than its own weight; such a criterion is hard for most consumers to measure. This means your drone may be covered for loss if you drop it while getting it out of the car, but if it falls from the sky while in use you are on your own.
From the insurer’s perspective, it appears drones and e-bikes are an unknown risk and until they have an accurate picture of that risk insurers tend to act conservatively.
Statistics NZ estimates 40,000 Kiwis now own e-bikes; some 500W models cost about $10,000. And recreational drones come in a wide range often costing $5000 or more.
As insurers start to see a claims trend it is likely that more exclusions and conditions will be applied to e-bikes and drones.
There is a 1960s and 70s precedent for this type of problem; insurers then began to exclude sporting goods ‘while in use’ after they found themselves paying out for bent golf clubs and damaged windsurfers. Likewise with laptops: insurers realised they were replacing damaged items with better equipment because you could no longer buy the same product with old software.
Some home contents policies will cover an e-bike smaller than 300W. Any machine more powerful than 300W is a ‘motorcycle’ under by NZTA regulations, so confusion arises because some motor manufacturers print on the motor the maximum ‘input power’ because that number is larger (typically motors run at about 80% efficiency), so giving the impression the buyer is getting a more powerful motor.
Some insurance policies will not cover e-bikes and drones, while others will set maximum standard limits but will include third-party damage.
The risk of a crash on an e-bike with a speed of 40km/h is at least as high as on any other vehicle travelling at that speed. But most home contents policies we looked at don’t cover owners for third-party damage to other vehicles.
If a drone causes an accident while it is in use near a road, the owner will mostly be left to foot the bill. While there are no e-bike specific policies on the market now, some insurers are starting to offer better cover for drones, given their increasing use in commercial applications.
Analysis by Dunedin-based Techion New Zealand shows the cost of undetected drench resistance in sheep has exploded to an estimated $98 million a year.
Shipping disruption caused by Houthi rebels in the Red Sea has so far not impacted fertiliser prices or supply on farm.
The opportunity to spend more time on farm while providing a dedicated service for shareholders attracted new environmental manager Ben Howden to work for Waimakariri Irrigation Limited (WIL).
Federated Farmers claims that the Otago Regional Council is charging ahead unnecessarily with piling more regulation on rural communities.
Dairy sheep and goat farmers are being told to reduce milk supply as processors face a slump in global demand for their products.
OPINION: We have good friends from way back who had lived in one of our major cities for many years.