fbpx
Print this page
Wednesday, 12 August 2026 15:55

Editorial: Hunting Policy Misses The Mark

Written by  Staff Reporters
Hunters generally see deer as a valuable resource. Hunters generally see deer as a valuable resource.

OPINION: As the general election approaches, political parties are churning out policies in the hope of attracting more votes.

However, some policies are missing the mark, like ACT's Backing Hunters policy.

The party proposes hunter-led management of game animals on conservaton land, something which has been handled by DoC. ACT wants the Game Animal Council to do this.

While this is music to the ears of hunters, farmers aren't impressed.

ACT will transfer responsibility for managing game animals on conservation land from DoC to the Game Animal Council, meaning hunters will set the targets rather than just being consulted. This will include full funding for all their current and proposed duties.

Farmers have fired a shot across ACT's bow, claiming that allowing the Game Animal Council to set game population targets is extremely concerning.

"ACT has fired a shot with this policy, but they've completely missed the mark," says Richard Dawkins, Federated Farmers pest management spokesperson.

Hunters generally see deer as a valuable resource. They want healthy herd numbers, plenty of hunting opportunitiees and, in some places, quality trophy animals.

On the other hand, many farmers view those same deer as pests that cause huge problems when they damage pasture, crops, fences, forestry and native vegetation.

Under ACT's plan, the people who value the animals would be setting the limits, while neighbouring farmers could carry the consequences and the costs.

Has ACT mistakenly assumed that the interests of hunters and neighbouring farmers are automatically aligned when they are not? 

In any case, farmers should not be expected to carry the cost of maintaining game animal populations for someone else's recreational benefit.

More like this

Editorial: The Value of Credibility

OPINION: In politics, credibility is and should be big. It must surely rank higher than charisma, which is quite trite and superficial. Yet, voters nowadays are often wooed and influenced by how someone looks or talks at a superficial level. TV plays a huge role in this.

NZ Pest Crisis Costs Farmers $466M a Year — Survey

New Zealand's pest problem has reached crisis point, according to Federated Farmers' second National Pests Survey, which shows farmers are spending more money and effort on control — yet pest numbers keep climbing faster than they were two years ago.

Featured

Chopped Salad Trend Arrives With NZ's Fresh Spring Veges

Bigger, bolder salads packed with colour, crunch and flavour are making headlines overseas — and the arrival of fresh spring vegetables means New Zealanders can now get chopping too, creating their own Great Kiwi Spring Salad.

Rabobank: China Quotas, Brazil Risk to Reshape Beef Trade

Chinese beef trade quotas and a looming suspension of Brazilian beef imports into the European Union are expected to reshape global beef trade flows over the remainder of 2026, with implications for New Zealand exporters, according to Rabobank's Q3 Global Beef Quarterly report.

Editorial: The Value of Credibility

OPINION: In politics, credibility is and should be big. It must surely rank higher than charisma, which is quite trite and superficial. Yet, voters nowadays are often wooed and influenced by how someone looks or talks at a superficial level. TV plays a huge role in this.

National

Machinery & Products