fbpx
Print this page
Tuesday, 03 July 2018 12:55

Farm subsidies distorting and ill-placed – report

Written by 
The report shows that the 51 countries reported on, plus 10 key emerging economies, paid on average US$620 billion annually to support farmers in 2015-17. The report shows that the 51 countries reported on, plus 10 key emerging economies, paid on average US$620 billion annually to support farmers in 2015-17.

More progress is needed on reducing and redesigning the world’s farm subsidy policies, says a new report from the OECD.

It says most farm subsidy policies remain poorly aligned with defined objectives, and measures that distort production and trade keep increasing in some countries. 

The OECD’s ‘Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2018’ report shows that the 51 countries reported on – all OECD and EU, plus 10 key emerging economies – paid on average US$620 billion annually to support farmers in 2015-17. Of this, nearly two-thirds is still provided via measures that strongly distort farm business decisions.

The report said almost 80% of the money went to individual farmers. Only 14% went to R&D or the infrastructure needed to equip farming for future challenges.

The report recommends looking hard at how to increase productivity growth sustainably and enhance environmental performance, especially given changing climates. Support should be aimed at helping farmers to better manage risks from weather, markets or other shocks that cannot always be anticipated.

subsidies OECDThe OECD says the report underscores that most agricultural policies today are not well-aligned with these objectives. 

“Progress in lowering support levels and shifting towards less distorting measures remains partial, and is not shared across all countries,” said Carmel Cahill, deputy director of the OECD trade and agricultural directorate.

“Government support of market prices harms consumers -- especially the less well-off -- and reduces the competitiveness of the food industry itself.

“Removing damaging and distorting policies is an important first step. 

“Support directly linked to output and input use makes domestic and international markets work less efficiently, encourages environmentally harmful over-use of farm inputs and consumes limited public funds that could be used for more efficient investments in the sector.”

Cahill says countries should re-direct farm subsidies to ensure the availability of public services that benefit producers, consumers and society overall.

The report said the biggest subsidies are paid by Iceland, Norway, Switzerland, Korea and Japan – 40-60% of total farm earnings. 

New Zealand and Australia are at the bottom of the OCED table of government support for farming.

More like this

Featured

Contract milkers hit hard by drought crisis

Many contract milkers in badly drought affected regions around the country are coming under severe financial stress and farm owners are being urged to help them through a bad patch until the start of the new season.

Controls lifted at poultry farm

Movement controls have been lifted from Mainland Poultry’s Hillgrove Farm in Otago, after the successful eradication of H7N6 strain of high pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI).

National

Helping protect sheep from parasites

Everyone from experienced veterinarians and young professionals to the Wormwise programme and outstanding clinics have been recognised in this year’s…

Machinery & Products

Farmer-led group buys Novag

While the name and technology remain unchanged and new machines will continue to carry the Novag name, all the assets,…

Buhler name to go

Shareholders at a special meeting have approved a proposed deal that will see Buhler Industries, the publicly traded Versatile and…